GESIS - DBK - ZA4976
 

ZA4976: Eurobarometer 72.2 (Sep-Oct 2009)

Downloads and Data Access


On this page you find the complete metadata and an overview of all available data sets and documents for the requested study. The download of all files is possible from our central search page under the following link:
ZA4976 Downloads and Data Access

List of Files

List of Files
 

Datasets

  • ZA4976_missing_v3-0-0.sps (Dataset) 2 KBytes
  • ZA4976_v3-0-0.dta (Dataset Stata) 19 MBytes
  • ZA4976_v3-0-0.por (Dataset SPSS Portable) 35 MBytes
  • ZA4976_v3-0-0.sav (Dataset SPSS) 19 MBytes

Questionnaires

  • ZA4976_bq.pdf (Questionnaire) 321 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_at.pdf (Questionnaire) 105 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_be-fr.pdf (Questionnaire) 107 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_be-nl.pdf (Questionnaire) 106 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_bg.pdf (Questionnaire) 214 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_cy.pdf (Questionnaire) 218 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_cz.pdf (Questionnaire) 169 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_de.pdf (Questionnaire) 106 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_dk.pdf (Questionnaire) 98 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_ee-ee.pdf (Questionnaire) 99 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_ee-ru.pdf (Questionnaire) 216 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_es-ca.pdf (Questionnaire) 101 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_es-es.pdf (Questionnaire) 103 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_fi-fi.pdf (Questionnaire) 227 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_fi-se.pdf (Questionnaire) 99 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_fr.pdf (Questionnaire) 105 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_gb.pdf (Questionnaire) 96 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_gr.pdf (Questionnaire) 220 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_hu.pdf (Questionnaire) 161 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_ie.pdf (Questionnaire) 97 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_it.pdf (Questionnaire) 102 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_lt.pdf (Questionnaire) 168 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_lu-de.pdf (Questionnaire) 107 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_lu-fr.pdf (Questionnaire) 104 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_lu-lu.pdf (Questionnaire) 104 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_lv-lv.pdf (Questionnaire) 177 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_lv-ru.pdf (Questionnaire) 216 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_mt-en.pdf (Questionnaire) 97 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_mt-mt.pdf (Questionnaire) 165 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_nl.pdf (Questionnaire) 104 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_pl.pdf (Questionnaire) 180 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_pt.pdf (Questionnaire) 102 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_ro.pdf (Questionnaire) 175 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_se.pdf (Questionnaire) 98 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_si.pdf (Questionnaire) 148 KBytes
  • ZA4976_q_sk.pdf (Questionnaire) 167 KBytes

Codebooks

  • ZA4976_cdb.pdf (Codebook) 4 MBytes
ZACAT online analysis and search in variable level documentation:
Eurobarometer 72.2: Nuclear Energy, Corruption, Gender Equality, Healthcare, and Civil Protection, September-October 2009
Availability Availability 0 - Data and documents are released for everybody.
Download of Data and Documents Download of Data and Documents All downloads from this catalogue are free of charge. Data-sets available under access categories B and C must be ordered via the shopping cart with a few exceptions. Charges apply! Please respect our Terms of use.


Bibliographic Citation

Citation Citation European Commission (2012): Eurobarometer 72.2 (Sep-Oct 2009). TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels [Producer]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4976 Data file Version 3.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11137
Study No.ZA4976
TitleEurobarometer 72.2 (Sep-Oct 2009)
Other Titles
  • Nuclear Energy, Corruption, Gender Equality, Healthcare, and Civil Protection (Subtitle)
Current Version3.0.0, 2012-1-30, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11137
Alternate IDs Alternate IDs
  • doi:10.3886/ICPSR28186.v1, 2010-05-26
Date of Collection11.09.2009 - 05.10.2009
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution
  • Papacostas, Antonis - European Commission, Brussels DG Communication, Public Opinion Analysis Sector

Content

AbstractNuclear energy, nuclear power plants. Corruption. Gender equality. Health and healthcare. Management of natural disasters. Topics: 1. Nuclear power: positive or negative associations with nuclear power; risks and benefits of nuclear power; contact with nuclear power issues in the past (visited a nuclear power plant, lived in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant, worked on nuclear energy issues); preferred sources of information about nuclear power; knowledge test on nuclear energy (EU as the largest nuclear energy producer, nuclear power plants are the only sources of radioactive waste, one third of Europe´s energy is produced by nuclear power plants, construction of new nuclear power plants in the own country); self-rated knowledge about the safety of nuclear power plants; most trusted sources of information on the safety of nuclear power plants; sufficient provision of information about the risks and benefits of different types of energy in school and through the media; assessment of nuclear power plants as a personal threat; assessment of the medial representation of nuclear incidents as exaggerated; attitude towards selected statements: safe operation of nuclear power plants is possible, national legislation ensures nuclear safety, national nuclear safety authority and companies ensure safe operation of nuclear power plants, safe disposal of nuclear waste, security against terrorism and criminal use; attitude towards the following statements on nuclear energy: helps to limit global warming, independence from imported fuels such as gas and oil, guarantees low and stable energy prices; reasons for and against extending the lifetime of nuclear power plants; attitude towards a reduction or increase of nuclear energy as a proportion of all energy sources; assessment of the benefits of an EU legislation on nuclear waste management; preferred site for a nuclear power plant (own country, another EU country outside the EU); preferred decision-making body in adapting and developing the energy supply (citizens, NGOs, or government agencies); interest in information on the safety of nuclear power plants; summarized assessment of the risks and benefits. 2. Corruption: opinion on corruption: is a big problem, assessment of existing corruption in local, regional, national, and EU institutions, successful prosecutions discourage from corruption; assumed spreading of corruption in selected areas; self-experienced corruption in the last 12 months; assessment of the causes for corruption; opinion on the fight against corruption: effective efforts of national governments, lenient court judgments, helpful support by the EU in the fight against corruption in the own country; assessment of the responsibility for preventing and fighting corruption; most trustworthy body for complaints in corruption cases. 3. Gender equality: occurrence of gender inequality; comparison with 10 years ago; opinion on the work of women: usually work less, number of working women in the own country is too low; preferred measures to increase the number of working women; unequal pay as a matter of urgency for the EU; important measures to reduce the gender pay gap; opinion on the employment of women: non-employment leads to isolation, father should give up his job to look after the children if his pay is lower than the one of the mother, childcare facilities costs are often higher than the additional income of the mother, career of the mother must be kept back for raising children, own income is indispensable for women, more men in education, role of men in the household; attitude towards men in child rearing and household; appropriate measures to improve the balance between work and family life; urgency to increase the proportion of women in parliament; most important measures to achieve a higher proportion of women; opinion on women in positions of responsibility: lower career orientation of women, less freedom due to obligations in family life, working life is dominated by men, too low-skilled women; assessment of the urgency to take action against violence against women; assessment of the urgency to take action against a higher risk of poverty for single mothers and older women; assessment of the occurrence of sexism in politics, media, work life, state institutions; areas where gender inequality occurs, and preferred measures at national or EU level; responsibility for gender equality in the state government or the EU; sufficiency of the measures made by the EU to combat gender inequality; successes in the last 10 years; reception of the actions taken by the EU to combat gender inequality in the media: equality of opportunity for all, gender equality in the workplace, empowerment of women in politics and business, increase the number of childcare facilities, increase the proportion of women in scientific research, strengthen gender equality in the context of the European structural funds, trafficking of women, combat sexism, strengthen women´s rights in developing countries; institutions that have contributed most to gender equality; assessment of the future: less stereotypes, equal pay, men will participate more in housework, higher proportion of women in government positions, more women in traditionally masculine occupations, less violence against women, increasing recognition of women´s rights in developing countries; impact of the economic crisis on gender inequality; knowledge of the rights against gender discrimination, for equal pay, for the protection of pregnant workers, for parental leave, for equal educational opportunities for both sexes; own experience with gender discrimination in education, at work, in society, in politics, in the health sector; own reaction to self-experienced discrimination; response to the complaint; contact person; institutions to contact in the case of discrimination. 4. Health and healthcare: most important criteria of high quality healthcare; assessment of the healthcare in the own country, and in comparison to other EU countries; likelihood to get harmed by hospital or non-hospital healthcare; assessment of the likelihood of adverse events in the case of receiving medical care: hospital infections, misdiagnosis, surgical errors, medication related errors, medical equipment related errors; personal or by a family member experienced adverse event of that kind; country in which the adverse event was experienced and reported; report of the adverse event; person or authority to whom the event was reported; institution responsible for patient safety in the own country; surgical procedure of the respondent or a family member recently; signing of a written consent before the procedure; assessment of the forms of redress if harmed whilst receiving healthcare in the own and another country; authorities that help in cases of redress in the own country and abroad; most important sources of information on adverse events in healthcare. 5. Natural hazards: perceived threat of natural disasters such as earthquake, flood, etc.; assessment of own knowledge about disaster prevention and preparedness by the EU and by the own country; attitude towards disaster management by the EU regarding natural disasters, industrial accidents, and terrorism; desire for more support from the EU in disaster prevention and disaster management in the own country; attitude towards the support of NGOs in disaster management by the EU; most important reasons for the support by the EU in disasters in the own country; attitude towards the cooperation of the EU with neighbouring countries concerning disaster management; most trusted source of information on natural hazards; introduction of common measures at European level for different kinds of disasters; attitude towards the introduction of common EU standards for the safety of buildings and the installation of common warning signals; own preparations for natural hazards; request for a reserve of equipment for use in natural events. Demography: nationality; marital status; family situation; age at end of education; sex; age; occupation; professional position; type of community; household size and household composition; own a mobile phone and fixed (landline) phone; possession of durable goods (entertainment electronics, Internet connection, possession of a car, a flat/a house have finished paying for or still paying for; financial difficulties during the last year; self-rated social position (scale); Internet use (at home, at work, at school). Also encoded was: date of the interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; number of persons present during the interview; respondent cooperation; interview language(only in LU, BE, ES, FI, EE, LV and MT); interviewer-ID; city size; region; weighting factor.
Categories Categories
  • Legal system, Legislation, Law
  • Work and Industry
  • Society, Culture
  • Technology, Energy
  • Medicine
Topics Topics
  • 6.2 Crime
  • 7.4 Health care and medical treatment
  • 13.4 Gender and gender roles
  • 14.1 Specific social services: use and provision
  • 16.2 Natural resources and energy

Methodology

Geographic Coverage
  • Belgium (BE)
  • Denmark (DK)
  • Germany (DE)
  • Greece (GR)
  • Spain (ES)
  • Finland (FI)
  • France (FR)
  • Ireland (IE)
  • Italy (IT)
  • Luxembourg (LU)
  • Netherlands (NL)
  • Austria (AT)
  • Portugal (PT)
  • Sweden (SE)
  • Great Britain (GB-GBN)
  • Northern Ireland (GB-NIR)
  • Cyprus (CY)
  • Czech Republic (CZ)
  • Estonia (EE)
  • Hungary (HU)
  • Latvia (LV)
  • Lithuania (LT)
  • Malta (MT)
  • Poland (PL)
  • Slovakia (SK)
  • Slovenia (SI)
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Romania (RO)
UniversePopulation of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over
Sampling Procedure Sampling Procedure
Probability Sample: Proportionate Stratified Multistage Sample
Mode of Collection Mode of Collection
Face-to-face interview CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available
Data CollectorTNS Dimarso, Brussels, Belgium TNS BBSS, Sofia, Bulgaria TNS Aisa, Prague, Czech Republic TNS GALLUP DK, Copenhagen, Denmark TNS Infratest, Munich, Germany Emor, Tallinn, Estonia TNS MRBI, Dublin, Ireland TNS ICAP, Athens, Greece TNS Demoscopia, Madrid, Spain TNS Sofres, Montrouge, France TNS Infratest, Milano, Italy Synovate, Nicosia, Cyprus TNS Latvia, Riga, Latvia TNS GALLUP Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania TNS ILReS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg TNS Hungary, Budapest, Hungary MISCO, Valletta, Malta TNS NIPO, Amsterdam, Netherlands Österreichisches GALLUP, Vienna, Austria TNS OBOP, Warsaw, Poland TNS EUROTESTE, Lisbon, Portugal TNS CSOP, Bucharest, Romania RM PLUS, Maribor, Slovenia TNS AISA SK, Bratislava, Slovak Republic TNS GALLUP Oy, Espoo, Finland TNS GALLUP, Stockholm, Sweden TNS UK, London, United Kingdom TNS Opinion, Brussels (fieldwork co-ordination)
Date of Collection
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Belgium)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Denmark)
  • 11.09.2009 - 28.09.2009 (Germany)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Greece)
  • 13.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Spain)
  • 14.09.2009 - 01.10.2009 (Finland)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (France)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Ireland (Republic))
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Italy)
  • 15.09.2009 - 05.10.2009 (Luxembourg)
  • 11.09.2009 - 29.09.2009 (Netherlands)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Austria)
  • 17.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Portugal)
  • 13.09.2009 - 30.09.2009 (Sweden)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Great Britain)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Northern Ireland)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Cyprus (Republic))
  • 12.09.2009 - 25.09.2009 (Czech Republic)
  • 11.09.2009 - 28.09.2009 (Estonia)
  • 11.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Hungary)
  • 11.09.2009 - 29.09.2009 (Latvia)
  • 12.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Lithuania)
  • 11.09.2009 - 26.09.2009 (Malta)
  • 12.09.2009 - 28.09.2009 (Poland)
  • 12.09.2009 - 27.09.2009 (Slovakia)
  • 11.09.2009 - 30.09.2009 (Slovenia)
  • 11.09.2009 - 24.09.2009 (Bulgaria)
  • 11.09.2009 - 21.09.2009 (Romania)

Errata & Versions

VersionDate, Name, DOI
3.0.0 (current version)2012-1-30 Archive edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11137
2.0.02010-5-26 Pre-release edition - all embargos lifted https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10009
1.0.02010-3-17 Pre-release edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4976
Errata in current version
DateSubjectDescription
2013-4-8P7_PT REGION I - NUTS 2(V552)Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the NUTS 2 REGIONS for PORTUGAL have changed. In accordance with the official EUROSTAT NUTS 2 version 2003 the region “LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO” is split up and the subregion “Lezíria do Tejo” reinstated to the “Alentejo” Region; “Médio Tejo” and “Oeste” are reinstated to the “Centro” Region. The documentation for NUTS 2 code 3 “Lisboa e Vale do Tejo” is not correct and should read “LISBOA” (NUTS2003-2010: PT17). Regions “CENTRO” and “ALENTEJO” do not change names but regional coverage (NUTS2003-2010: PT16 and PT18). The regions “NORTE” (PT11) and “ALGARVE” (PT15) remain unchanged. Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the autonomous regions AÇORES (PT20) and MADEIRA (PT30) are not covered anymore. This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013.
2013-4-8P7_GR REGION II- NUTS 1 (V575)Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR42) as well as the Ionian Islands ("Ionia Nisia" with NUTS 2 code GR22) are not covered. The documentation for NUTS 1 code 4 is not correct. The data only cover the island of Crete (NUTS 2 code GR43). This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013.
Version changes

Further Remarks

Number of Units: 26663
Number of Variables: 587
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata

Publications

Publications
  • European Opinion Research Group EEIG: Special Eurobarometer 71.2 Attitudes of Europeans towards Corruption. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication. Brussels: European Commission November 2009 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_325_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 71.2 Gender equality in the EU in 2009. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication. Brussels: European Commission February 2010 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_326_en.pdf
  • European Opinion Research Group EEIG: Special Eurobarometer 71.2 Patient safety and quality of healthcare. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication. Brussels: European Commission April 2010 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_327_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 71.2 Civil protection. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication. Brussels: European Commission November 2009 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_328_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 324 / Wave 72.2: Europeans and Nuclear Safety. Report. Survey was requested by the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (“Research and Political Analysis” Unit). Brussels, March 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_324_en.pdf
Relevant full texts
from SSOAR (automatically assigned)

Groups

Research Data Centre
Groups
  •  EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
    Since the early nineteen seventies the European Commission´s “Standard and Special Eurobarometer” are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries at times. Interviews are conducted face-to-face, in each spring and each autumn, at all times based on new samples with a size 1000 respondents per country. Separate samples are drawn for Northern Ireland and East Germany. After the EU enlargement in 2004, remaining and new Candidate Countries are also regularly included in selected surveys. The Standard Eurobarometer modules ask for attitudes towards European unification, institutions and policies, complemented by measurements for general socio-political orientations, as well as by respondent and household demographics. Intermittently special Eurobarometer modules extensively address topics, such as environment, science and technology, health or family issues, social or ethnic exclusion, quality of life etc. The “European Communities Studies” 1970-1973 can be considered forerunner studies, as well the “Attitudes towards Europe” from 1962.