GESIS - DBK - ZA5235
 

ZA5235: Eurobarometer 73.5 (Jun 2010)

Downloads and Data Access


On this page you find the complete metadata and an overview of all available data sets and documents for the requested study. The download of all files is possible from our central search page under the following link:
ZA5235 Downloads and Data Access

List of Files

List of Files
 

Datasets

  • ZA5235_missing_v4-0-0.sps (Dataset) 2 KBytes
  • ZA5235_v4-0-0.dta (Dataset Stata) 17 MBytes
  • ZA5235_v4-0-0.por (Dataset SPSS Portable) 31 MBytes
  • ZA5235_v4-0-0.sav (Dataset SPSS) 16 MBytes

Questionnaires

  • ZA5235_bq.pdf (Questionnaire) 236 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_at.pdf (Questionnaire) 80 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_be-fr.pdf (Questionnaire) 84 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_be-nl.pdf (Questionnaire) 82 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_bg.pdf (Questionnaire) 172 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_cy.pdf (Questionnaire) 178 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_cz.pdf (Questionnaire) 143 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_de.pdf (Questionnaire) 82 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_dk.pdf (Questionnaire) 78 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_ee-ee.pdf (Questionnaire) 77 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_ee-ru.pdf (Questionnaire) 176 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_es-ca.pdf (Questionnaire) 79 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_es-es.pdf (Questionnaire) 81 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_fi-fi.pdf (Questionnaire) 78 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_fi-se.pdf (Questionnaire) 78 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_fr.pdf (Questionnaire) 82 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_gb.pdf (Questionnaire) 76 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_gr.pdf (Questionnaire) 178 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_hu.pdf (Questionnaire) 133 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_ie.pdf (Questionnaire) 76 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_it.pdf (Questionnaire) 79 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_lt.pdf (Questionnaire) 140 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_lu-de.pdf (Questionnaire) 83 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_lu-fr.pdf (Questionnaire) 82 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_lu-lu.pdf (Questionnaire) 81 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_lv-lv.pdf (Questionnaire) 149 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_lv-ru.pdf (Questionnaire) 179 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_mt-en.pdf (Questionnaire) 76 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_mt-mt.pdf (Questionnaire) 139 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_nl.pdf (Questionnaire) 82 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_pl.pdf (Questionnaire) 149 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_pt.pdf (Questionnaire) 79 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_ro.pdf (Questionnaire) 146 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_se.pdf (Questionnaire) 78 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_si.pdf (Questionnaire) 127 KBytes
  • ZA5235_q_sk.pdf (Questionnaire) 140 KBytes

Codebooks

  • ZA5235_cdb.pdf (Codebook) 3 MBytes
ZACAT online analysis and search in variable level documentation:
Eurobarometer 73.5: Civil Justice, Development Aid, Africa and the European Union, and Food Risk, June 2010
Availability Availability 0 - Data and documents are released for everybody.
Download of Data and Documents Download of Data and Documents All downloads from this catalogue are free of charge. Data-sets available under access categories B and C must be ordered via the shopping cart with a few exceptions. Charges apply! Please respect our Terms of use.


Bibliographic Citation

Citation Citation European Commission (2012): Eurobarometer 73.5 (Jun 2010). TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels [Producer]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5235 Data file Version 4.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11432
Study No.ZA5235
TitleEurobarometer 73.5 (Jun 2010)
Other Titles
  • Civil Justice, Development Aid, Africa and the European Union, and Food Risk (Subtitle)
Current Version4.0.0, 2012-8-31, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11432
Alternate IDs Alternate IDs
  • doi:10.3886/ICPSR34084.v1, 4.0.0
Date of Collection09.06.2010 - 30.06.2010
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution
  • Papacostas, Antonis - European Commission, Brussels DG Communication, Public Opinion Analysis Sector

Content

AbstractSince the early 1970s the European Commission´s Standard & Special Eurobarometer are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries. Principal investigators are the Directorate-General Communication and on occasion other departments of the European Commission or the European Parliament. Over time, candidate and accession countries were included in the Standard Eurobarometer Series. Selected questions or modules may not have been surveyed in each sample. Please consult the basic questionnaire for more information on country filter instructions or other questionnaire routing filters. In this study the following modules are included: 1. Standard indicators on living conditions and expectations, 2. European Social Fund (ESF), 3. Civil justice and commercial legal proceedings in the member states and the EU, 4. Attitudes towards development aid, 5. Africa: problems, image and relation to the EU, 6. Risk issues regarding food. Topics: 1. Standard indicators on living conditions and expectations: life satisfaction; assessment of the current situation in different areas (personal living area, national health care, retirement benefits, unemployment benefits, cost of living, relations between people of different culture, religion or nationality, dealing with inequality and poverty, affordable energy, affordable housing functioning public administration, national economic conditions, personal job situation and financial situation and national employment situation); expected development of the personal life situation in general and in the areas mentioned above and compared to the period five years ago. 2. European Social Fund (ESF): most important general issues and based on social policy and employment policy, which the European Union should address as a priority; preference for the solution of social issues for the whole EU or focus on the poorest regions and countries of the EU; awareness of the European Social Fund (ESF). 3. Civil justice and commercial legal proceedings in the member states and the EU: own involvement in civil or commercial legal proceedings with a person or a company from an EU Member State and from a non EU country; difficulty to access civil justice in another EU Member State; need for additional measures to support citizens in obtaining their rights; type of personal experience in civil or commercial legal proceedings abroad (based on marriage, children or contractual disputes); non-EU country in which the respondent had personal experience in civil or commercial proceeding; most important obstacles to start legal proceedings in another EU member State; perceived difficulties in the enforcement of a positive judgment for the respondent in another EU country; perceived encouragement by a judicial declaration (exequatur) to institute legal proceedings against a person in another EU country; importance of EU measures to simplify the procedures for enforcing court decisions in another country; knowledge of the procedure introduced by the EU to recover cross-border small claims; source of information about this process; knowledge of the European order for payment procedure (European Payment Order); source of information about this process; knowledge of common standards in the EU to qualify for legal aid (Cross-Border Civil Case); source of information on this standard; preferred EU measures for cross-border family law areas (international distinctions, control of financial matters in connection with a marriage, control of financial matters for unmarried but officially recognized couple); attitude towards the automaticall validity of an agreement on the distribution of the belongings of a divorcing couple in all other EU member states; personal experience with the presentation of documents such as birth certificate, marriage certificate or death certificate in another EU country; need to submit a translation or legalization of this document; attitude towards a universal recognition of civil status documents in the EU; preference for an automatic recognition of documents or the issuance of standard formats or improvement of mechanism for translating these documents; attitude towards general system for the recognition of adoptions. 4. Attitudes towards development aid: biggest challenges facing developing countries; attitude towards development aid; personal involvement in development aid (donations or volunteer activities); preference for international organizations or individual countries as best actors for development aid; attitude towards changes in the scope of official development aid and towards a cooperation of the EU Member States in development aid; preferred political guidelines for the alignment of development aid. 5. Africa / problems, image and relation to the EU: expected increase in the importance of Africa as a partner for the EU; most important areas of cooperation between the EU and Africa; most important problems for African countries to tackle together; areas that characterize the positive image of Africa. 6. Risk issues regarding food: most important criteria that are associated with food and eating (satisfying hunger, enjoying a meal with friends, selecting fresh and tasty foods, looking for affordable prices, checking calories and nutrients, concerns about the safety of food); probability of certain dangerous events (being a victim of a crime, food and environmental pollution damages the own health, negative effects of the economic crisis, being injured in a car accident, getting a serious illness); most important problems and risks associated with food and eating; perceived anxiety associated with food (BSE, genetically modified food, allergic reactions, additives, food poisoning from bacteria, pesticide residues, antibiotic residues and pollutants in meat products, substances in plastic coming into contact with food, unbalanced diet, diet-related disease, weight gain, new viral diseases such as avian flu, animal cloning, the welfare of farmed animals, the quality and freshness of food, nano particles in food); trust in sources of information about food risks (media, scientists, national and european authorities for food safety, European institutions, the state government, consumer groups, environmental protection groups, farmers, food manufacturers, supermarkets and shops, health professionals, family and friends, information found on the Internet); attitude towards food safety (scale: increasing food security, greater safety of food produced in the EU, strict EU laws guaranteeing food security, quick action of public authorities, public authorities as consumer representatives, negligent authorities, using the most recent scientific evidence by public authorities in the EU, authorities in the EU are doing a good job for food safety, dependence of scientific advice on commercial and political interests, development of unhealthier food over the years, demand for more information about healthy diets and lifestyles by public authorities in the EU, public authorities take into account citizens’ concerns regarding food safety); probability of personal measures to avoid certain risks and judgment on the efforts of European authorities to protect consumers from these risks (contamination of food by pesticides or pollutants such as mercury, bacterial contamination of food such as salmonella, diet-related health risks by fatty diet, risks of new technologies such as aninmal cloning and nanotechnology, transmission of animal infections to humans such as BSE); last time of the reception of information on unsafe food containing chemical substances (Split A) or on unhealthy food containing too much fat or salt (Split B); personal reaction to these information regarding unsafe or harmful food. Demography: nationality; age; marital status and family situation; regional origin; age at end of education; sex; occupation; type of community; household composition and household size; own a mobile phone and fixed (landline) phone; possession of durable goods (entertainment electronics, internet connection, possession of a car, a flat/a house have finished paying for or still paying for); financial difficulties during the last year; self-rated social position (scale); internet use (at home, at work, at school). Also encoded was: date of interview; beginning of interview; duration of interview; persons present during the interview; willingness to cooperate; interview language; city size; region; country; weighting factor.
Categories Categories
  • International Institutions, Relations, Conditions
  • Legal system, Legislation, Law
  • Patterns of Consumption
  • Medicine
  • Economic Policy, National Economic Situation
Topics Topics
  • 6.3 Legal systems
  • 7.2 Nutrition
  • 11.2 International politics and organisation
  • 11.6 Government, political systems and organisation
  • 17.4 Economic conditions and indicators

Methodology

Geographic Coverage
  • Belgium (BE)
  • Denmark (DK)
  • Germany (DE)
  • Greece (GR)
  • Spain (ES)
  • Finland (FI)
  • France (FR)
  • Ireland (IE)
  • Italy (IT)
  • Luxembourg (LU)
  • Netherlands (NL)
  • Austria (AT)
  • Portugal (PT)
  • Sweden (SE)
  • Great Britain (GB-GBN)
  • Northern Ireland (GB-NIR)
  • Cyprus (CY)
  • Czech Republic (CZ)
  • Estonia (EE)
  • Hungary (HU)
  • Latvia (LV)
  • Lithuania (LT)
  • Malta (MT)
  • Poland (PL)
  • Slovakia (SK)
  • Slovenia (SI)
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Romania (RO)
UniversePopulation of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over
Sampling Procedure Sampling Procedure
Probability Sample: Proportionate Stratified Multistage Sample
Mode of Collection Mode of Collection
Face-to-face interview CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available
Data CollectorTNS Dimarso, Brussels, Belgium; TNS BBSS, Sofia, Bulgaria; TNS Aisa, Prague, Czech Republic; TNS GALLUP DK, Copenhagen, Denmark; TNS Infratest, Munich, Germany; Emor, Tallinn, Estonia; TNS MRBI, Dublin, Ireland; TNS ICAP, Athens, Greece; TNS Demoscopia, Madrid, Spain; TNS Sofres, Montrouge, France; TNS Infratest, Italy; Synovate, Nicosia, Cyprus; TNS Latvia, Riga, Latvia; TNS GALLUP Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania; TNS ILReS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg; TNS Hungary, Budapest, Hungary; MISCO, Valletta, Malta; TNS NIPO, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Österreichisches GALLUP, Vienna, Austria; TNS OBOP, Warsaw, Poland; TNS EUROTESTE, Lisbon, Portugal; TNS CSOP, Bucharest, Romania; RM PLUS, Maribor, Slovenia; TNS AISA SK, Bratislava, Slovakia; TNS GALLUP Oy, Espoo, Finland; TNS GALLUP, Stockholm, Sweden; TNS UK, London, United Kingdom; TNS Opinion, Brussels (international co-ordination).
Date of Collection
  • 11.06.2010 - 30.06.2010 (Belgium)
  • 11.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Denmark)
  • 11.06.2010 - 30.06.2010 (Germany)
  • 11.06.2010 - 26.06.2010 (Greece)
  • 13.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Spain)
  • 09.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Finland)
  • 11.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (France)
  • 11.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Ireland (Republic))
  • 11.06.2010 - 29.06.2010 (Italy)
  • 11.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Luxembourg)
  • 11.06.2010 - 29.06.2010 (Netherlands)
  • 10.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Austria)
  • 11.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Portugal)
  • 10.06.2010 - 29.06.2010 (Sweden)
  • 11.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Great Britain)
  • 11.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Northern Ireland)
  • 11.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Cyprus (Republic))
  • 11.06.2010 - 25.06.2010 (Czech Republic)
  • 12.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Estonia)
  • 11.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Hungary)
  • 10.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Latvia)
  • 12.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Lithuania)
  • 11.06.2010 - 25.06.2010 (Malta)
  • 12.06.2010 - 28.06.2010 (Poland)
  • 12.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Slovakia)
  • 10.06.2010 - 27.06.2010 (Slovenia)
  • 11.06.2010 - 21.06.2010 (Bulgaria)
  • 11.06.2010 - 22.06.2010 (Romania)

Errata & Versions

VersionDate, Name, DOI
4.0.0 (current version)2012-8-31 Archive edition update https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11432
3.0.02012-3-13 Archive pre-release (all embargos lifted) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11309
2.0.02011-4-26 Archive pre-release (embargo update) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10342
1.0.02011-3-11 Archive pre-release https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10266
Errata in current version
DateSubjectDescription
2013-4-8P7_PT REGION I - NUTS 2 (V459)Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the NUTS 2 REGIONS for PORTUGAL have changed. In accordance with the official EUROSTAT NUTS 2 version 2003 the region “LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO” is split up and the subregion “Lezíria do Tejo” reinstated to the “Alentejo” Region; “Médio Tejo” and “Oeste” are reinstated to the “Centro” Region. The documentation for NUTS 2 code 3 “Lisboa e Vale do Tejo” is not correct and should read “LISBOA” (NUTS2003-2010: PT17). Regions “CENTRO” and “ALENTEJO” do not change names but regional coverage (NUTS2003-2010: PT16 and PT18). The regions “NORTE” (PT11) and “ALGARVE” (PT15) remain unchanged. Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the autonomous regions AÇORES (PT20) and MADEIRA (PT30) are not covered anymore. This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013.
2013-4-8P7_GR REGION II- NUTS 1 (V482) Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR42) as well as the Ionian Islands ("Ionia Nisia" with NUTS 2 code GR22) are not covered. The documentation for NUTS 1 code 4 is not correct. The data only cover the island of Crete (NUTS 2 code GR43). This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013.
Version changes

Further Remarks

Number of Units: 26691
Number of Variables: 502
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata

Publications

Publications
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 349 / Wave 73.5: Social Climate. Survey requested by European Commission Directorate-General Employment and coordinated by Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM “Research and Speechwriting” Unit). Brussels, October 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_349_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 350 / Wave 73.5: The European Social Fund. Survey requested by the Directorate-General for “Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities” and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (“Research and Speechwriting” Unit). Brussels: November 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 351 / Wave 73.5: Civil Justice. Survey requested by the Directorate-General for Justice (DG JUST) and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (“Research and Speechwriting” Unit). Brussels: October 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_351_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 352 / Wave 73.5: Europeans, development aid and the Millennium Development Goals. Survey requested by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific States and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (“Research and Speechwriting” Unit). Brussels: September 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_352_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 353 / Wave 73.5: The EU and Africa: Working towards closer partnership. Survey requested by the Directorate-General for “Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific States” and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (“Research and Speechwriting” Unit). Brussels: November 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_353_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 354 / Wave 73.5: Food-related risks. Survey requested by the “European Food Safety Authority”, Brussels, November 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_354_en.pdf
Relevant full texts
from SSOAR (automatically assigned)

Groups

Research Data Centre
Groups
  •  EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
    Since the early nineteen seventies the European Commission´s “Standard and Special Eurobarometer” are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries at times. Interviews are conducted face-to-face, in each spring and each autumn, at all times based on new samples with a size 1000 respondents per country. Separate samples are drawn for Northern Ireland and East Germany. After the EU enlargement in 2004, remaining and new Candidate Countries are also regularly included in selected surveys. The Standard Eurobarometer modules ask for attitudes towards European unification, institutions and policies, complemented by measurements for general socio-political orientations, as well as by respondent and household demographics. Intermittently special Eurobarometer modules extensively address topics, such as environment, science and technology, health or family issues, social or ethnic exclusion, quality of life etc. The “European Communities Studies” 1970-1973 can be considered forerunner studies, as well the “Attitudes towards Europe” from 1962.