GESIS - DBK - ZA2073
 

ZA2073: International Relations (February 1964)

Downloads and Data Access


Downloads

We are currently not allowing direct download or shopping cart orders of restricted files, only non-restricted files can be downloaded directly. More information here.

Data access

Datasets

sortsort


Questionnaires

sortsort

Availability Availability A - Data and documents are released for academic research and teaching.
Download of Data and Documents Download of Data and Documents All downloads from this catalogue are free of charge. Data-sets available under access categories B and C must be ordered via the shopping cart with a few exceptions. Charges apply! Please respect our Terms of use.


Bibliographic Citation

Citation Citation USIA, Washington DIVO, Frankfurt (1996): International Relations (February 1964). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA2073 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.2073
Study No.ZA2073
TitleInternational Relations (February 1964)
Current Version1.0.0, 2010-4-13, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.2073 (Publication Year 1996)
Date of Collection02.1964 - 02.1964
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution
  • USIA, Washington DIVO, Frankfurt

Content

AbstractQuestions on foreign policy and security policy. Judgement on nuclear weapon tests and disarmament questions. Comparison of USA and USSR. Topics: Most important problems of the country; satisfaction with the standard of living; best friend and greatest enemy of the country; attitude to France, USA, Great Britain, the Soviet Union and China; preferred East-West-orientation of the country; agreement of national interests with the interests of the Soviet Union or the interests of the USA; judgement on American and Soviet foreign policy as well as on their peace efforts; comparison of the scientific, economic and military strength of the two world powers; preference for the Soviet Union or for North America as major military power; expected winner in the contest of the economic systems; willingness to make an increased European defense contribution to the NATO; estimate of the danger of a Soviet attack; comparison between Soviet citizens and Americans concerning the liberties available and the fair share in the prosperity of the country; perceived rapproachment of the two world powers; attitude to an agreement between the USA and the Soviet Union on abolition of nuclear weapons tests and expected effect on the standard of living; USA or USSR as forerunner of disarmament agreements; knowledge about the prohibition of underground nuclear tests within the scope of such an agreement; attitude to a nuclear-weapon-free zone in Europe; attitude to a unification of Western Europe; desired attitude of a European Community to the United States; perceived influence of organizations and associations in the country; attitude to increased American private investments in the country and to a European foreign aid; perceived rapproachment of the Soviet Union and Red China as well as assessment of the development of the Soviet-Chinese conflict; most probable cause and possible circumstances of a nuclear war; knowledge about the UN membership of one´s country; attitude to the UN and to a UN military force; assessment of the treatment of non-whites in France, America, in the Soviet Union and in South Africa (in Great Britain also asked about the treatment in one´s own country); knowledge about race problems in the USA and influence of this knowledge on the image of America; interest in international politics; especially admired politician in Western Europe; listening to foreign radio stations; trade union membership; party preference. Interviewer rating: social class of respondent. Also encoded were: duration of interview; number of contact attempts; willingness of respondent to cooperate; size of city; date of interview (FRG only). In Italy the following questions were also asked: daily papers read; change in election behavior compared to the year before; radio ownership and frequency ranges; place of interview.
Categories Categories
  • International Institutions, Relations, Conditions
Topics Topics
  • 11.2 International politics and organisation
  • 11.3 Conflict, security and peace
  • 11.6 Government, political systems and organisation
  • 13.8 Minorities

Methodology

Geographic Coverage
  • Germany (DE), FRG without West Berlin
  • France (FR)
  • Great Britain (GB-GBN)
  • Italy (IT)
UniversePersons aged 21 and older.
Sampling Procedure Sampling Procedure
Multi-stage random sample
Mode of Collection Mode of Collection
Oral interview with standardized questionnaire.
Data CollectorDIVO, Frankfurt SIRME, Societa Internazionale per le Ricerche di Mercato, Milano Institut Francais d`Opinion Publique, Paris Gallup Poll, London
Date of Collection
  • 02.1964

Errata & Versions

VersionDate, Name, DOI
1.0.0 (current version)2010-4-13 Version number created automatically (implementation of a uniform versioning policy) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.2073 (Publication Year unknown)
Errata in current version
none
Version changes

Further Remarks

Notes1200 persons were interviewed in Germany, 1215 in France, 1055 in Great Britain and 1175 in Italy. The study has the USIA-designation XX-16. The USIA/Studies in the XX-series (international relations) from XX-2 to XX-18 are archived under ZA Study Nos. 1969-1976 as well as 2069-2074 and 2124-2127.
Number of Units: 4645
Number of Variables: 185
Data Type: -
Analysis System(s): SPSS

Publications

Publications
  • Merritt, Richard L.; Puchala, Donald J. (Hrsg.): Western European Perspectives on International Affairs: Public Opinion Studies and Evaluations. New York: Praeger 1968.
Relevant full texts
from SSOAR (automatically assigned)

Groups

Groups
  • International Relations
    Principal Investigator: USIA, Washington; Data Collector: DIVO, Frankfurt