GESIS - DBK - ZA4975
 

ZA4975: Eurobarometer 72.1 (Aug-Sep 2009)

Downloads and Data Access


Downloads

We are currently not allowing direct download or shopping cart orders of restricted files, only non-restricted files can be downloaded directly. More information here.

Data access

Datasets

sortsort


Questionnaires

sortsort


Codebooks

sortsort

ZACAT online analysis and search in variable level documentation:
Eurobarometer 72.1: Poverty and Social Exclusion, Social Services, Climate Change, and the National Economic Situation and Statistics, August-September 2009
Availability Availability 0 - Data and documents are released for everybody.
Download of Data and Documents Download of Data and Documents All downloads from this catalogue are free of charge. Data-sets available under access categories B and C must be ordered via the shopping cart with a few exceptions. Charges apply! Please respect our Terms of use.


Bibliographic Citation

Citation Citation European Commission (2012): Eurobarometer 72.1 (Aug-Sep 2009). TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels [Producer]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4975 Data file Version 3.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11136
Study No.ZA4975
TitleEurobarometer 72.1 (Aug-Sep 2009)
Other Titles
  • Poverty and Social Exclusion, Social Services, Climate Change, and the National Economic Situation and Statistics (Subtitle)
Current Version3.0.0, 2012-2-3, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11136
Alternate IDs Alternate IDs
  • doi:10.3886/ICPSR28185.v1, 2010-03-15
Date of Collection28.08.2009 - 17.09.2009
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution
  • Papacostas, Antonis - European Commission, Brussels DG Communication, Public Opinion Analysis Sector

Content

AbstractPoverty and social exclusion, social services, climate change, and the national economic situation and statistics. Topics: 1. Poverty and social exclusion: own life satisfaction (scale); satisfaction with family life, health, job, and satisfaction with standard of living (scale); personal definition of poverty; incidence of poverty in the own country; estimated proportion of the poor in the total population; poor persons in the own residential area; estimated increase of poverty: in the residential area, in the own country, in the EU, and in the world; reasons for poverty in general; social and individual reasons for poverty; population group with the highest risk of poverty; things that are necessary to being able to afford to have a minimum acceptable standard of living (heating facility, adequate housing, a place to live with enough space and privacy, diversified meals, repairing or replacing a refrigerator or a washing machine, annual family holidays, medical care, dental care, access to banking services as well as to public transport, access to modern means of communication, to leisure and cultural activities, electricity, and running water); perceived deprivation through poverty in the own country regarding: access to decent housing, education, medical care, regular meals, bank services, modern means of communication, finding a job, starting up a business of one’s own, maintaining a network of friends and acquaintances; assessment of the financial situation of future generations and current generations compared to parent and grandparent generations; attitude towards poverty: necessity for the government to take action, too large income differences, national government should ensure the fair redistribution of wealth, higher taxes for the rich, economic growth reduces poverty automatically, poverty will always exist, income inequality is necessary for economic development; perceived tensions between population groups: rich and poor, management and workers, young and old, ethnic groups; general trust in people, in the national parliament, and the national government (scale); trust in institutions regarding poverty reduction: EU, national government, local authorities, NGOs, religious institutions, private companies, citizens; reasons for poverty in the own country: globalisation, low economic growth, pursuit of profit, global financial system, politics, immigration, inadequate national social protection system; primarily responsible body for poverty reduction; importance of the EU in the fight against poverty; prioritized policies of the national government to combat poverty; assessment of the effectiveness of public policies to reduce poverty; opinion on the amount of financial support for the poor; preference for governmental or private provision of jobs; attitude towards tuition fees; increase of taxes to support social spending; individual or governmental responsibility (welfare state) to ensure provision; attitude towards a minimum wage; optimism about the future; perceived own social exclusion; perceived difficulties to access to financial services: bank account, bank card, credit card, consumer loans, and mortgage; personal risk of over-indebtedness; attitude towards loans: interest free loans for the poor, stronger verification of borrowers by the credit institutions, easier access to start-up loans for the unemployed, free financial advice for the poor, possibility to open a basic bank account for everyone; affordable housing in the residential area; extent of homelessness in the residential area, and recent change; adequacy of the expenditures for the homeless by the national government, and the local authorities; assumed reasons for homelessness: unemployment, no affordable housing, destruction of the living space by a natural disaster, debt, illness, drug or alcohol addiction, family breakdown, loss of a close relative, mental health problems, lack of access to social services and support facilities, lack of identity papers, free choice of this life; probability to become homeless oneself; own support of homeless people: monetary donations to charities, volunteer work in a charity, help find access in emergency shelters and with job search, direct donations of clothes to homeless people, buying newspapers sold by homeless people, food donations; sufficient household income, or difficulties to make ends meet; ability to afford the heating costs, a week’s holiday once a year, and a meal with meat every second day; expected development of the financial situation of the household; assessment of the risk of potential difficulties in the next 12 months in paying: rent, mortgage, consumer loan rates, electricity bills, unexpected events, daily consumer goods; job security; difficulties in fulfilling family responsibilities because of the workload; difficulties in concentrating at work due to family commitments; necessary minimum monthly income for the own household; comparison of the monthly income of the household with the average; self-assessment on a poverty scale; utilization of social services: long-term care service, child care services, service of job centers, social housing services, social assistance; assessment of the quality and affordability of these social services; preferred way of solving problems of old people who no longer manage to live alone (elderly care): living with the children, regular visits by a child, care through nursing services, nursing home; best form of organization of childcare for children aged 0-3 and 3-6 years: preschool, home, home care by person, by both parents or only by mother / father, or other relatives; necessity of pre-school education; population groups that should be prioritized in receiving social assistance and in having access to social housing; reasonable proportion of the household income that should be spent on the care of parents and child; primary responsibility for the provision of social services: public sector at national, regional or local level, private sector, or NGOs; assessment of the quality of health services and the state pension system (scale). 2. Climate change: most important problems in the world: climate change, terrorism, poverty, disease, global economic crisis, proliferation of nuclear weapons, war, increase in world population; assessment of climate change as a serious problem (scale); sufficient action against climate change through: the national government, the EU, regional and local authorities, industry, citizens; attitude towards climate change (scale: irreversible process, problem is exaggerated, influence of carbon dioxide (Split: question appended with ´and other greenhouse gases´) on climate change is marginal, positive impact of the fight against climate change on the European economy, use of alternative fuels (Split: question appended with ´such as bio fuels´) to reduce greenhouse gases, personal action against climate change); kind of personal action taken; increase in economic growth in the EU through environmental protection, environmental protection as an obstacle to economic growth; willingness to pay more in order to use energy produced from sustainable energy sources (in percent). 3. Economy: assessment of the growth rate of the gross domestic product and the inflation rate in the own country in 2008 compared to 2007; assessment of the unemployment rate in 2008; importance of statistical information in political decision making; trust in official statistics; importance of knowing economic data; assessment of the situation on the labour market and the economic situation in the own country compared to other European countries. Demography: nationality; age; marital status; age at end of education; sex; occupation; professional position; type of community; household composition and household size; own a mobile phone and fixed (landline) phone; possession of durable goods (entertainment electronics, internet connection; financial difficulties during the last year; self-rated social position (scale); internet use (at home, at work, at school). Also encoded was: date of interview; interview; duration of interview; persons present during the interview; willingness to cooperate; city size; region; weighting factor.
Categories Categories
  • Economic Policy, National Economic Situation
  • Social Policy
Topics Topics
  • 5.8 Social behaviour and attitudes
  • 13.9 Social exclusion
  • 14.1 Specific social services: use and provision
  • 16.4 Environmental degradation/pollution and protection
  • 17.2 Income, property and investment/saving
  • 17.4 Economic conditions and indicators
  • 17.6 Economic systems and development

Methodology

Geographic Coverage
  • Belgium (BE)
  • Denmark (DK)
  • Germany (DE)
  • Greece (GR)
  • Spain (ES)
  • Finland (FI)
  • France (FR)
  • Ireland (IE)
  • Italy (IT)
  • Luxembourg (LU)
  • Netherlands (NL)
  • Austria (AT)
  • Portugal (PT)
  • Sweden (SE)
  • Great Britain (GB-GBN)
  • Northern Ireland (GB-NIR)
  • Cyprus (CY)
  • Czech Republic (CZ)
  • Estonia (EE)
  • Hungary (HU)
  • Latvia (LV)
  • Lithuania (LT)
  • Malta (MT)
  • Poland (PL)
  • Slovakia (SK)
  • Slovenia (SI)
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Romania (RO)
UniversePopulation of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over
Sampling Procedure Sampling Procedure
Probability Sample: Proportionate Stratified Multistage Sample
Mode of Collection Mode of Collection
Face-to-face interview CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available
Data Collector TNS Dimarso, Brussels, Belgium TNS BBSS, Sofia, Bulgaria TNS Aisa, Prague, Czech Republic TNS GALLUP DK, Copenhagen, Denmark TNS Infratest, Munich, Germany Emor, Tallinn, Estonia TNS ICAP, Athens, Greece TNS Demoscopia, Madrid, Spain TNS Sofres, Montrouge, France TNS MRBI, Dublin, Ireland TNS Infratest, Milano, Italy Synovate, Nicosia, Cyprus TNS Latvia, Riga, Latvia TNS GALLUP Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania TNS ILReS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg TNS Hungary, Budapest, Hungary MISCO, Valletta, Malta TNS NIPO, Amsterdam, Netherlands Österreichisches GALLUP, Vienna, Austria TNS OBOP, Warsaw, Poland TNS EUROTESTE, Lisbon, Portugal TNS CSOP, Bucharest, Romania RM PLUS, Maribor, Slovenia TNS AISA SK, Bratislava, Slovakia TNS GALLUP Oy, Espoo, Finland TNS GALLUP, Stockholm, Sweden TNS UK, London, United Kingdom TNS Opinion, Brussels (fieldwork co-ordination)
Date of Collection
  • 28.08.2009 - 15.09.2009 (Belgium)
  • 28.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Denmark)
  • 28.08.2009 - 15.09.2009 (Germany)
  • 28.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Greece)
  • 01.09.2009 - 14.09.2009 (Spain)
  • 29.08.2009 - 17.09.2009 (Finland)
  • 28.08.2009 - 14.09.2009 (France)
  • 28.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Ireland (Republic))
  • 31.08.2009 - 14.09.2009 (Italy)
  • 28.08.2009 - 16.09.2009 (Luxembourg)
  • 28.08.2009 - 16.09.2009 (Netherlands)
  • 28.08.2009 - 09.09.2009 (Austria)
  • 01.09.2009 - 14.09.2009 (Portugal)
  • 29.08.2009 - 16.09.2009 (Sweden)
  • 28.08.2009 - 14.09.2009 (Great Britain)
  • 31.08.2009 - 15.09.2009 (Northern Ireland)
  • 28.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Cyprus (Republic))
  • 28.08.2009 - 11.09.2009 (Czech Republic)
  • 28.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Estonia)
  • 28.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Hungary)
  • 28.08.2009 - 14.09.2009 (Latvia)
  • 29.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Lithuania)
  • 28.08.2009 - 12.09.2009 (Malta)
  • 29.08.2009 - 14.09.2009 (Poland)
  • 29.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Slovakia)
  • 28.08.2009 - 14.09.2009 (Slovenia)
  • 28.08.2009 - 06.09.2009 (Bulgaria)
  • 28.08.2009 - 13.09.2009 (Romania)

Errata & Versions

VersionDate, Name, DOI
3.0.0 (current version)2012-2-3 Archive edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11136
2.0.12010-9-30 Pre-release edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10129
2.0.02010-8-31 Pre-release edition (all embargos lifted) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10120
1.0.02010-3-15 Pre-release edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4975
Errata in current version
DateSubjectDescription
2013-4-8P7_PT REGION I - NUTS 2(V513)Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the NUTS 2 REGIONS for PORTUGAL have changed. In accordance with the official EUROSTAT NUTS 2 version 2003 the region “LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO” is split up and the subregion “Lezíria do Tejo” reinstated to the “Alentejo” Region; “Médio Tejo” and “Oeste” are reinstated to the “Centro” Region. The documentation for NUTS 2 code 3 “Lisboa e Vale do Tejo” is not correct and should read “LISBOA” (NUTS2003-2010: PT17). Regions “CENTRO” and “ALENTEJO” do not change names but regional coverage (NUTS2003-2010: PT16 and PT18). The regions “NORTE” (PT11) and “ALGARVE” (PT15) remain unchanged. Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the autonomous regions AÇORES (PT20) and MADEIRA (PT30) are not covered anymore. This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013.
2013-4-8P7_GR REGION II- NUTS 1 (V536)Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR42) as well as the Ionian Islands ("Ionia Nisia" with NUTS 2 code GR22) are not covered. The documentation for NUTS 1 code 4 is not correct. The data only cover the island of Crete (NUTS 2 code GR43). This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013.
Version changes
Changes between version 2.0.1 and it's previous version
DateSubjectDescriptionCorrection Description
2010-9-30qb1t.9 / qb1t.10Variable label exchanged2010-9-30

Further Remarks

NotesThe special topical module QA on "Poverty and social exclusion" includes selected questions from the "European Quality of Life Survey" (EQLS), a project of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound).
Number of Units: 26719
Number of Variables: 556
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata

Publications

Publications
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 71.1 Poverty and Social Exclusion. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication. Brussels: European Commission February 2010 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_321_en.pdf
  • Tamás Keller, Márton Medgyesi and István György Tóth: Analysing the link between measured and perceived income inequality in European countries. Research note no. 8. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General "Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities" February 2010
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 71.1 Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication. Brussels: European Commission November 2009 http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_322_en.pdf
  • TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 323 / Wave 72.1: Europeans’ knowledge of economic indicators. Survey requested and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (“Research and Political Analysis” Unit). Brussels, January 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_323_en.pdf
Relevant full texts
from SSOAR (automatically assigned)

Groups

Research Data Centre
Groups
  •  EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
    Since the early nineteen seventies the European Commission´s “Standard and Special Eurobarometer” are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries at times. Interviews are conducted face-to-face, in each spring and each autumn, at all times based on new samples with a size 1000 respondents per country. Separate samples are drawn for Northern Ireland and East Germany. After the EU enlargement in 2004, remaining and new Candidate Countries are also regularly included in selected surveys. The Standard Eurobarometer modules ask for attitudes towards European unification, institutions and policies, complemented by measurements for general socio-political orientations, as well as by respondent and household demographics. Intermittently special Eurobarometer modules extensively address topics, such as environment, science and technology, health or family issues, social or ethnic exclusion, quality of life etc. The “European Communities Studies” 1970-1973 can be considered forerunner studies, as well the “Attitudes towards Europe” from 1962.