GESIS - DBK - ZA1126

ZA1126: States Study Autumn 1974

Downloads and Data Access

On this page you find the complete metadata and an overview of all available data sets and documents for the requested study. The download of all files is possible from our central search page under the following link:
ZA1126 Downloads and Data Access

List of Files

List of Files


  • ZA1126_fb.pdf (Questionnaire) 4 MBytes


  • ZA1126_cod.pdf (Codebook) 262 KBytes
Availability Availability A - Data and documents are released for academic research and teaching.
Download of Data and Documents Download of Data and Documents All downloads from this catalogue are free of charge. Data-sets available under access categories B and C must be ordered via the shopping cart with a few exceptions. Charges apply! Please respect our Terms of use.

Bibliographic Citation

Citation Citation Dabler, Monika; Garding, Hartmut; Gluchowski, Peter (1982): States Study Autumn 1974. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA1126 Data file Version 1.0.0,
Study No.ZA1126
TitleStates Study Autumn 1974
Current Version1.0.0, 2010-4-13, (Publication Year 1982)
Date of Collection10.1974 - 10.1974
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution
  • Dabler, Monika - Sozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Alfter/Bonn
  • Garding, Hartmut - Sozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Alfter/Bonn
  • Gluchowski, Peter - Sozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Alfter/Bonn


AbstractPolitical attitudes before the state parliament elections 1974 in the states Schleswig-Holstein, Rhineland-Palatinate, North Rhine-Westphalia, Bavaria and Hesse. Judgement on parties and politicians. The questionnaire consists of a nationally uniform part and a state-specific part. Topics: 1. nationally uniform part: judgement on the economic situation and assumed economic development; extent to which politically informed and political interest; attitude to tax reform; spectrum of parties voted for by respondent in Federal Parliament elections since 1949; behavior at the polls in the Federal Parliament election 1972; personal change in party voted for; party preference and party ties; preferred federal chancellor; judgement on the government Schmidt/Genscher as well as the relationship of the FDP to the SPD; party inclination (split); changes of party sympathies in the course of time; most important political tasks in the FRG; preferred CDU/CSU politicians in leading positions; issue ability of the parties and selected politicians; sympathy scale for the SPD, CDU/CSU and the FDP; judgement on the Young Union as well as the Jusos {Young Socialists}; assessment of personal political location on the question of price stability and securing jobs as well as assumed attitudes of top politicians and parties; judgement on current foreign policy relations and their significance for the future; parties one cannot vote for; assessment of changes within a party since 1969; assumed identity of interests of the parties represented in the Federal Parliament; attitude to rejection of draft laws by the CDU/CSU majority in the Federal Upper House; judgement on Schmidt as federal chancellor (scale). 2a. State-specific part: judgement on the economic situation of the state; degree of familiarity of state politicians; knowledge about the party affiliation of selected politicians; preferred prime minister; profiles of characteristics of the prime minister candidates; most important state political goals; party preference at state level (ballot procedure); behavior at the polls in the last state parliament election; preferred government coalition; sympathy scale for the parties at state level. 2b. In Lower Saxony (as follow-up survey after the state parliament election had taken place): assessment of the economic situation and economic development; personal election participation and behavior at the polls in the last state parliament election; time of voting decision; satisfaction with the prime minister and the election result; election result corresponding to one´s own expectation; preferred government coalition; judgement on the election campaign; assessment of state or national political character of the state parliament election; expected influence of the change of federal chancellor on this election; knowledge about the counting error in the state parliament election; assumed reasons for this error; assumed party influence on this counting error; attitude to a new election and presumed change of personal behavior at the polls in this case; party preference (ballot procedure); sympathy changes regarding selected politicians and parties since the last state parliament election. 3. To all: knowledge of lay-offs in one´s own economic area; probability of loss of job next year regarding respondent as well as a member of the household; possession of a telephone. Demography: age; sex; marital status; religious denomination; frequency of church attendance; school education; occupational position; employment; household income; household composition; respondent is head of household; characteristics of head of household; self-assessment of social class; city size; state; union membership; Interviewer rating: length of interview; day of interview; interest of respondent in interview; number of contact attempts.
Categories Categories
  • Political Attitudes and Behavior
Topics Topics
  • 11.5 Mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion
  • 11.6 Government, political systems and organisation
  • 11.7 Elections


Geographic Coverage
  • Schleswig-Holstein (DE-SH)
  • Rhineland-Palatinate (DE-RP)
  • North Rhine-Westphalia (DE-NW)
  • Bavaria (DE-BY)
  • Hesse (DE-HE)
  • Lower Saxony (DE-NI)
  • Germany (DE)
UniverseNo specific information
Analysis Unit Analysis Unit
  • Individual
Sampling Procedure Sampling Procedure
  • Probability: Multistage
  • Probability: Stratified: Disproportional
Multi-stage over-sample stratified random sample (ADM mastersample). Beyond the individual representative state samples for the above-mentioned states a small ´national sample´ was taken. Besides statements about the individual states, after cleaning the over-sample of the state sample through a weighting factor (specified in the data set) statements about the entire territory of the Federal Republic are also possible.
Mode of Collection Mode of Collection
  • Face-to-face interview
Oral survey with standardized questionnaire
Time Method Time Method
  • Cross-section
Kind of Data Kind of Data
  • Numeric
Data CollectorGETAS, Bremen
Date of Collection
  • 10.1974

Errata & Versions

VersionDate, Name, DOI
1.0.0 (current version)2010-4-13 Version number created automatically (implementation of a uniform versioning policy) (Publication Year unknown)
Errata in current version
Version changes

Further Remarks

NotesA split questionnaire was used in which a question was posed in alternative form (see split). With the exception of Lower Saxony (by-election investigation) all data were collected in the framework of a pre-election investigation. The nationally uniform part of the questionnaire permits statements about the entire territory of the Federal Republic. The 4287 respondents are distributed among the individual states as follows: Schleswig-Holstein 560, Lower Saxony 589, North Rhine-Westphalia 638, Hesse 624, Rhineland-Palatinate 639, Bavaria 654, remaining states (small national sample) 583. In the course of the survey the the question of the most important goals was posed twice in identical manner. See also the State Study 1975 archived under ZA Study No. 1127.
Number of Units: 4287
Number of Variables: 220
Data Type: single-punch
Analysis System(s): -


Relevant full texts
from SSOAR (automatically assigned)


Research Data Centre